IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.
Mayur Jain, S/o. Lalit Kumar Jain - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. and Anr. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1618 Of 2023
Decided On : 06-04-2023
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 376(2)(f) and 34 - Criminal Appeal – Cruelty by husband and relatives of husband – Compromise and settled - Matrimonial matter - Petitioner submits that petitioner and respondent No.2 are husband and wife - Parties have entered into a compromise in on-going criminal proceedings – In impugned FIR along with criminal proceedings initiated pursuant thereto against petitioner may be quashed - Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (Para 8).
Finding Of Court :
Court considering that complainant is aunt (Mami) of present petitioner and also considering that FIR in question was lodged social pressure and also finding that present case is wholly covered by principle of law laid down by the Larger Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of and in case of State of aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between parties.
Result: Misc. Petition Allowed.
ORDER :
1. This instant criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the FIR No.320/2022 registered at Police Station Nokha, District Bikaner for offences under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 376(2)(f) and 34 IPC on the basis of compromise entered between the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and respondent No.2 are husband and wife. The parties have entered into a compromise in the on-going criminal proceedings. In such circumstances, the impugned FIR along with criminal proceedings initiated pursuant thereto against the petitioner may be quashed.
3. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner and complainant have arrived at compromise and settled their dispute and in the view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex court in the case of B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana, reported in 2003 (4) SCC p.675 in which it has been held that the proceedings under Section 498A IPC can be quashed because it is the matrimonial matter, the criminal proceedings for offence under Section 498-A IPC are liable to be quashed.
4. This Court is conscious of the judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Prashant Bhartiya Vs. State of Delhi & Ors. in Criminal Appeal No.708 of 2021 decided on 30.07.2021, relevant portion of which reads as follows:-
4. During pendency of the proceedings, the parties were referred to mediation having regard to the fact that a child was born in the meanwhile (i.e. in the year 2018). As a consequence, a mediated settlement limited to the maintenance and upkeep of the child was arrived at by them.
5. Having regard to these facts and the submissions made on behalf of the complainant - who does not dispute that this may not be an appropriate case for pursuing the prosecution further, this Court is of the considered view that the criminal proceedings must be quashed.
6. In the peculiar circumstances of the present case, the impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside; the FIR (No. 616) and all consequent proceedings be quashed. It is, however, made clear that this order will not come in the way or in any manner prejudice the contentions of the parties in any other pending proceedings, which shall 20-09-2022 be decided in accordance with law.
7. The appeal is allowed to the above extent.”
5. Learned counsels for the petitioner has submitted the following order for consideration passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No.4119/2021 decided on 06.04.2022 (Dhabba Nath Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.), which reads as follows:-
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of investigation, the petitioner and the complainant have entered into a compromise and thus, no dispute remains pending between them and the complainant does not wish to continue with the present litigation.
3. Learned counsel further submits that the compromise in question has been produced before the Investigating Officer, who has verified the factum of compromise and the same has been executed without any force or coercion.
4. Learned counsel submits that the complaint in question came be to be lodged by the complainant on a
SupremeToday
Point of law: Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The court established that FIRs can be quashed when a compromise is reached between the parties, invoking inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The inherent power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings based on compromises when the likelihood of conviction is minimal and justice favors dismissal.
The court established that compromises between parties can lead to the quashing of FIRs under Section 482 Cr.P.C. when both parties agree not to pursue the matter.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.