Narayan vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2238

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2238

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Narayan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Rajendra Charan
For the Respondent: S.S. Rajpurohit, Nepal Singh

Table of Content
1. petition for quashing fir based on compromise. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding resolution of dispute and lack of prosecution interest. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's consideration of arguments and material. (Para 4)
4. judicial precedents guiding quashing of fir based on compromise. (Para 5 , 7)
5. court's reasoning for allowing quash based on settled disputes. (Para 8 , 9)
6. final order to quash fir and associated proceedings. (Para 10 , 11)

ORDER :

1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the FIR No. 0067/2023 registered at Police Station Raipur, Distt. Bhilwara for the offence under Sections 342 , 506, 376(2)(n) of IPC and Section 5L/6 of POCSO Act and entire criminal proceedings pursuant thereto qua the petitioner, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the complainant-respondent No. 2 and the petitioner have already entered into compromise and on the basis of it, there is no possibility of conviction of the petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 342 , 506, 376(2)(n) of IPC and Section 5L/6 of POCSO Act. It is also ar