Anil vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2230

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2230

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Anil – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohan Ram Choudhary
For the Respondents: Shrawan Vishnoi, Vivek Sharma

ORDER :

1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the FIR No. 166/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Pali, Distt. Pali for the offence under Sections 354 , 376 IPC and entire criminal proceedings pursuant thereto, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the complainant-respondent No. 2 and the petitioner have already entered into compromise and on the basis of it, there is no possibility of conviction of the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 354 , 376 IPC. It is also argued that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the trial against the petitioner for the aforesaid offences because the same may derail the compromise arrived at between the parties.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 has admitted that the parties have already entered into compromise and resolved their dispute amicably and the respondent No. 2 does not want to press the charges levelled against the petitioner in relation to offences punishable under Sections 354 , 376 IPC.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and carefu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document