IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
REKHA BORANA, J.
Mahaveer Singh S/o Shri Javar Singh – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, through the Under Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16366 of 2019
Decided On : 03-07-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Physical Endurance Test - Recruitment process pertaining - Food Corporation of India - Watchmen for manning posts - Held, Recruitment to public services must command public confidence - Persons who are recruited are intended to fulfil public functions associated with the functioning of Government - Where entire process is found to be flawed, its cancellation may undoubtedly cause hardship to a few who may not specifically be found to be involved in wrongdoing - Held, It is not correct to say that if a number of vacancies are notified for appointment and adequate number of candidates are found fit, successful candidates acquire an indefeasible right to be appointed which cannot be legitimately denied - Ordinarily notification merely amounts to an invitation to qualified candidates to apply for recruitment and on their selection they do not acquire any right to post - Unless relevant recruitment rules so indicate, State is under no legal duty to fill up all or any of vacancies - Writ petition dismissed.
ORDER :
1. At the outset, it is relevant to note that the present writ petition was preferred by total 119 petitioners. Vide order dated 20.04.2022, the petition was dismissed qua petitioners Nos.4, 5, 10, 13, 22, 24, 31, 40, 42, 43, 47, 54, 55, 56, 68, 69, 73, 74, 81, 82, 83, 87, 88, 98, 101, 102, 103 & 104 i.e. 28 petitioners. The present petition now survives only qua the remaining petitioners and therefore the present judgment would govern all the petitioners except petitioners Nos.4, 5, 10, 13, 22, 24, 31, 40, 42, 43, 47, 54, 55, 56, 68, 69, 73, 74, 81, 82, 83, 87, 88, 98, 101, 102, 103 & 104 (28 in number).
2. The present writ petition has been preferred against the information/communication dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure-6) whereby complete recruitment process pertaining to recruitment of ‘Watchmen for manning posts’ undertaken by the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘the FCI’) has been cancelled.
3. The case of the petitioners is that in pursuance to advertisement No. FCI-RAJASTHAN/01/2017 issued by the FCI for recruitment to the post of ‘Watchmen for manning posts’ in its Depots and Offices for 281 number of vacancies, all the petitioners had applied. After the completion of the selection process including the Written Test, Physical Endurance Test (PET) and Medical Test, on 28.03.2018, the provisional select list was issued by the respondent Department in terms of which all the petitioners stood selected.
4. Being provisionally selected, the petitioners were awaiting appointment orders but on 20.09.2019, an information was uploaded by the respondent Department on its official website to the effect that before issuing the appointment orders to the successful candidates, a Committee was constituted at the regional level for verification of the documents and the Committee pointed out certain discrepancies/irregularities and therefore, the matter was referred to the CBI for investigation. As per the report of the CBI, serious irregularities were found in the written test and attendance sheet of PET of certain candidates and therefore, criminal case has been directed to be registered. As the CBI report proves that no sanctity had been maintained in the recruitment process and there had been irregularities and impersonation in the same, the recruitment process stands cancelled. It is against the said information dated 20.09.2019 uploaded on the official website of the respondent Department that the present writ petition has been preferred.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners raised the following grounds:
(ii) The same agency against which the allegations have been levelled qua the recruitment in question, was the recruitment agency in the State of Gujarat too and therein because of specific conclusion of only 4 candidates to be tainted, only they were excluded and other candidates were afforded appointment.
(iii) So far as the present recruitment is concerned, only 14 candidates had been concluded by the CBI to be involved and even the criminal case had been directed to be registered against those 14 candidates only. Therefore, when the tainted candidates were specifically identified, only they could have been penalised and all the remaining candidates who were not found to be involved in any sought of malpractice could not have been denied appointment and the complete recruitment process ought not to have
Food Corporation of India and Others vs. Bhanu Lodh and Others
Girjesh Shrivastava and Others vs. State of M.P. and Others
Jatinder Kumar and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Joginder Pal and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Kumari Anamica Mishra and Another vs. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad and Others
Sachin Kumar and Others vs. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) and Others
Shankarsan Dash vs. Union of India
Union of India vs. Manoj Kumar Sharma
Union of India and Another vs. Rajesh P.U. Puthuvalnikathu and Another
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of the entire selection process should only be considered if there is no chance of segregating genuine candidates from those ....
Point of Law : It is well settled that a candidate after having been declared unsuccessful, can lay challenge to selection process, if the same is conducted in violation of statutory rules/Recruitmen....
Appointments from systemically tainted recruitment process void ab initio; no Article 311(2) protection or individual enquiry required; State may terminate en masse to restore public service purity.
Provisional appointment cancellations must follow due disciplinary processes; removal without inquiry violates natural justice principles.
In cases of widespread irregularities in selection processes, cancellation of entire selection is justified, as separation of affected candidates is not feasible.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.