SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 921

KULDEEP MATHUR
Bhiyaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ratna Ram, Advocate, S.K. Bhati, Advocate, Manish Dadhich, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.02/2023, registered at Police Station Panchu, District Bikaner for offences punishable under Sections 458, 308, 325, 323, 435, 506 and 143 IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners so also the learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that though an FIR under various sections of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was lodged against the petitioners but the Investigating Agency did not find prima facie any offence under the said Act proved against them and, consequently, a case was registered under various sections of IPC. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners have not been named in FIR lodged by the complainant. Learned counsel further submitted that even from the perusal of the FIR, it is apparent that a blow from iron rod has been attributed to Umedaram and even the allegations of putting fire and burning down the fencing outside the house of the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top