SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 921

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Kuldeep Mathur, J.
Bhiyaram & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1461 of 2023
Decided On : 04-02-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Ratna Ram, Advocate, S.K. Bhati, Advocate, Manish Dadhich, Advocate

The court considered the absence of evidence for specific offences and the length of the trial in granting bail to the accused petitioners.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Offences under IPC - The court granted bail to the accused petitioners after considering the absence of evidence for the offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the circumstances of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The accused petitioners filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. after being arrested for offences under various sections of IPC. The petitioners argued that the FIR did not name them and that the trial would take a long time.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the accused petitioners after considering the submissions, facts, and circumstances of the case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused petitioners should be granted bail despite the serious nature of the charges against them.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to grant bail based on the absence of evidence for the offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the length of the trial.

Final Decision: The bail application of the accused petitioners was allowed, and they were ordered to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the specified personal bond and sureties.

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.02/2023, registered at Police Station Panchu, District Bikaner for offences punishable under Sections 458, 308, 325, 323, 435, 506 and 143 IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners so also the learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that though an FIR under various sections of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was lodged against the petitioners but the Investigating Agency did not find prima facie any offence under the said Act proved against them and, consequently, a case was registered under various sections of IPC. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners have not been named in FIR lodged by the complainant. Learned counsel further submitted that even from the perusal of the FIR, it is apparent that a blow from iron rod has been attributed to Umedaram and even the allegations of putting fire and burning down the fencing outside the house of the complainant have been levelled against the Ishudan and Jagdish only. Challan has been filed. The petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused petitioners.

4. On the contrary, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioners.

5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserve to be accepted.

6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners Bhiyaram S/o Sh. Magharam, Girdhari S/o Sh. Magharam, Rameshwar S/o Sh. Bachnaram, Aduram S/o Sh. Bachnaram and Shivram S/o Sh. Chunaram arrested in connection with FIR No.02/2023, registered at Police Station Panchu, District Bikaner shall be enlarged on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for their appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so, till completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top