SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 542

KULDEEP MATHUR
Pappu Ram @ Revanta Ram S/o Prahlad Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Jitendra Ojha.
For the Respondent: Mohd. Javed Gouri.

JUDGMENT :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 92/2022 registered at Police Station Nagana, District Barmer for the offences under Sections 451, 354, 323, 363, 366 and 376(2)(n) and Section 3(1) (B) (ii), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the statements of prosecutrix recorded before the competent criminal court on 21.06.2023 as P.W.1, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the prosecutrix in her Court’s statements has not supported the prosecution story. Learned counsel submitted that in view of the fact that the prosecutrix has not supported the prosecution story as alleged against the appellant in FIR and turned hostile, the chances of appellant being convicted in the present case are very bleak. Learned counsel submitted that the appellant is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time to conclude. Thus, learned counsel pray

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top