SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 964

KULDEEP MATHUR
Balkaran Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Verma, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate, Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.217/2022 registered at Police Station 217/2022, District Mahila Thana, District Sriganagar for the offences under Section 376 of IPC and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the material available on record.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that petitioner and complainant had consensual relationship. Learned counsel further submitted that from the statement of the prosecutrix, it is clear that she had voluntarily travelled with him to various public places. Learned counsel further submitted that even the alleged video has been recovered from the mobile of prosecutrix. He further submits that the appellant is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time to conclude. Thus, learned counsel submits that benefit of bail may be extended to the appellant.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehementl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top