IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Kuldeep Mathur, J.
Bhagirath – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1770 of 2022
Decided On : 24-01-2023
SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Bail Application - Consent in Relationship
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the dismissal of his bail application by the Special Court. The appellant argued that the prosecutrix had voluntarily stayed with him and they had a consensual relationship, while the prosecution opposed these submissions.
Finding of the Court:
The Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, found that the appeal deserved acceptance and allowed the appellant's bail application.
Issues: Consent in the relationship, merits of the case
Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and decided to allow the appellant's appeal without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, granting bail to the appellant.
JUDGMENT
Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 15.10.2022 passed by the learned Special Court, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur Metro in Criminal Misc. Case No.390/2022, arising out of FIR No.273/2022, P.S. Luni, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 384, 366 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code; Section 67 of the IT Act and Sections 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the appellant has been dismissed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. While drawing attention of the Court towards the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., learned counsel for the appellant submits that from the perusal of the statement of the prosecutrix, it is evident that she has voluntarily stayed with the petitioner at various places including Hyderabad for a period of more than three months. Learned counsel further submitted that the appellant and the prosecutrix had consensual relationship. However, when their relationship turned strained, present FIR has been lodged against the petitioner to teach him a lesson.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the submissions made on behalf of the appellant.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the appeal filed by the appellant deserves acceptance.
6. In view of the above, the present appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 15.10.2022 passed by the learned Special Court, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur Metro in Criminal Misc. Case No.390/2022 is set aside and the bail application filed by the appellant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that accused-appellant Bhagirath S/o Shri Hardev Ram arrested in connection with FIR No.273/2022, P.S. Luni, Jodhpur shall be released on bail; provided he executes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Appellant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The Court considered the consent in the relationship and the facts and circumstances of the case in deciding to grant bail to the appellant.
The main legal point established is that the appellant deserves bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
Consensual nature of the relationship and likelihood of trial duration as factors in granting bail under the SC/ST Act.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the entirety of facts and circumstances, and the arguments presented.
The court established that bail can be granted under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act when the circumstances indicate that the accused may not pose a flight risk and the trial may take consid....
The court considered the nature of the offenses, absence of injuries, and expected trial duration in deciding to grant bail to the accused-appellant.
The court's decision was based on the consideration of the trivial nature of the incident, the extent of the victim's injuries, and the appellant's period of incarceration in granting bail.
The court established that in cases involving non-serious charges and prolonged trial durations, bail may be granted even under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.