IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Vijay Bishnoi, Madan Gopal Vyas, JJ.
Pannalal @ Prakash – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan Through P.P. – Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 7/2023
Decided On : 09-01-2023
Limitation Act - Application for condoning delay - The court allowed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and condoned the delay of 66 days in filing the appeal.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the application and deemed it appropriate to condone the delay. The record was summoned, and the appeal was tagged along with another appeal. The court also suspended the substantive sentence of the accused appellant.
Issues: Application for condoning delay, suspension of sentence
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and found it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence of the accused appellant.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, tagged the appeal with another appeal, and suspended the substantive sentence of the accused appellant.
ORDER
1. The matter comes up for consideration of the application (IA No.1/2022 dated 20.12.2022) preferred on behalf of the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act with a prayer for condoning the delay of 66 days in filing the present appeal.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor has not seriously opposed the application (IA No.1/2022 dated 20.12.2022) preferred by the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the averments made in the application (IA No.01/2022 dated 20.12.2022), we deem it appropriate to allow the same.
4. Let the application (IA No.01/2022 dated 20.12.2022) preferred by the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. The delay of 66 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
Admit.
Issue notice.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Hence, notice need not be issued.
6. As the record is being summoned in D.B. Criminal Appeal No.123/2022 (Narayan @ Parbhu Bhil & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan), the present appeal be tagged along with the above referred appeal.
Heard learned counsel for the parties on D.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.14/2023.
7. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the sentence of the other co-accused persons viz. Narayan @ Parbhu Bhil, Shanker Bhil, Roshan Bhil, Raku @ Rukmani and Leela Bhil have already been suspended by this Court on 14.12.2022 in D.B. Criminal Misc. SOS Application No.785/2022 (Narayan @ Parbhu Bhil & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) and the case of the appellant is not distinguishable from that of co-accused persons.
8. Learned Public Prosecutor prays for some time to file reply to D.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.14/2023, however, he is not in a position to dispute the fact that the sentence of the other co-accused persons viz. Narayan @ Parbhu Bhil, Shanker Bhil, Roshan Bhil, Raku @ Rukmani and Leela Bhil have already been suspended and the case of the appellant is not distinguishable from that of co-accused persons.
9. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, we consider it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellant.
10. Accordingly, D.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.14/2023 filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide judgment dated 16.08.2022 in Sessions Case No.15/2018 against appellant - Pannalal @ Prakash S/o Shri Varda Bhil shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 08.02.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the appellant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
11. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court has the discretion to condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and to suspend the substantive sentence under Sec.389 Cr.P.C.
The court has the discretion to condone delays in filing appeals upon sufficient cause and to suspend sentences pending appeal subject to specific conditions to ensure the integrity of the judicial p....
The court has the power to exercise suo moto powers to condone delay in filing an appeal and to suspend sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C., allowing the accused to be released on bail with specified....
The court established that the suspension of a sentence pending appeal is a discretionary power that can be exercised in the interest of justice, particularly when the accused has been in custody for....
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.
Suspension of sentence granted due to similarity with co-accused cases and potential delays in appeal.
The court's capacity to condone delays in appeals based on sufficient cause, particularly in emotional contexts.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.