SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1739

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Narendra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. The petitioners by way of this writ petition has prayed as under:-

    "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this Writ petition and-

i) Held illegal condition of advertisement imposed on page No. 14, Phase-II, Merit list on advertisement (annexure-1) and restrained the respondents to ensure the direction of office memorandum dated 15.01.2016 & 29.06.2015 (Annexure-6) in the larger interest of justice.

ii) Direct the respondents to selection made only basis of total marks obtained by the candidate in the Written examination and other test treat only qualifying test.

iii) Direct the respondents to give appointment to the petitioners on the post of Gardner and Washerman respectively if found eligible.

iv) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fir and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the earlier directions issued vide the Office Memorandum in 2015 and 2016 did not require to count the marks obtained in Trade Test for the purpose of selection for the post of Constable (Driver). Learned counsel submits that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top