RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sangeet Lodha, Manoj Kumar Garg, JJ.
Meer Jamal Deen - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 13768/2021
Decided On : 05-10-2021
Encroachment - Land Rights - Various Sections - The court emphasized the need for a structured mechanism to address land encroachments, referencing guidelines for eviction and the principle that removal is the rule while regularization is the exception.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking removal of encroachments on specific land recorded as barren, requesting that unauthorized constructions be prohibited.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondents must consider the petitioner's grievances in light of previous court directions and established guidelines for handling land encroachments.
Issues: Whether the respondents are obligated to act on the petitioner's complaint regarding land encroachments and unauthorized constructions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a permanent mechanism should be established for addressing land encroachments, reinforcing that removal is the standard procedure while regularization is an exception.
Result: The writ petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to act in accordance with the law.
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking directions to the respondents to remove the encroachment from land comprising Khasra Nos.62, 112, 117, 118, 120, 123, 124, 125, 127 of Village Nagaraja, Gram Panchayat Chelak, Tehsil Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer, which is alleged to be recorded in the revenue record as Barren/Banjar land. The petitioner has also sought a direction to the respondents to not to permit any unauthorized and illegal construction on aforesaid land.
The respondents are under an obligation to consider the grievances raised by the petitioner keeping in view the directions issued by this Court in the case of Gulab Kothari (supra) and the directions/guidelines issued by a Coordinate Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No.10819/2018 : Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. vide order dated 30.01.2019, which reads as under:
The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 wherein all the State Governments of the country were directed that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/Poramboke/ Shamlat land and the same must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. The said scheme should provide for the speedy eviction of illegal occupants, after giving them a show cause notice and a brief hearing. It was further held therein that long duration of the illegal encroachment/occupation of land or huge expenditure in making construction thereon or political connections of trespassers are no justification for regularising such illegal occupation. Regularisation should be permitted only in exceptional cases where lease has been granted under some government notification .e.g. to landless labourers or members of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes or where there is already a school, hospital, dispensary, 'shamshan', 'kabristan' or other public utility of the like nature on the land.
Observations of the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh (supra) thus leave no manner of doubt that removal of encroachment on all such land is a rule and regularisation an exception and that too in extremely limited number of cases, which only the Government can do by appropriate notification of the government and
The court established that removal of encroachments is the standard approach, with regularization only permissible in exceptional cases as per government notification.
The court established that authorities must prioritize the removal of illegal encroachments on public land, with regularization being a rare exception.
The court established that encroachment removal is standard practice, with regularization allowed only in exceptional cases as per government notification.
The court established that removal of encroachments on public land is a legal obligation, with regularization being an exception under strict conditions.
The Court emphasized the need for a permanent mechanism to address encroachments and referred to the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others, (2011....
Removal of encroachment on public land is a rule, and regularisation is an exception, to be permitted only in limited cases by the government.
Availability of suitable remedies for grievances and the role of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) in addressing illegal encroachments.
The judgment emphasizes the need for a permanent mechanism to address encroachments and the speedy eviction of illegal occupants.
The court emphasized the need for a permanent mechanism, the Public Land Protection Cell, to address encroachment issues and directed the petitioner to seek redressal through this mechanism.
The establishment of a permanent mechanism, the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC), to address encroachments on public land and the court's reliance on the Division Bench Judgment in a similar case t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.