SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1354

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Babu - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 557 of 2021
Decided On : 18-09-2021

Advocates appeared:
Avinash Bhati, Advocate, Anees Bhurat, Advocate

The court established that the suspension of a sentence can be granted when the accused has been in custody for a significant period and the nature of the offense does not involve a commercial quantity of contraband.

Headnote:

[SUSPENSION] - [SENTENCE] - [The court granted the second application for suspension of sentence based on the argument that the recovered contraband was below commercial quantity and the appellant had been in judicial custody for an extended period. The court emphasized the need for a fair trial and the right to appeal, leading to the decision to suspend the sentence until the appeal's final disposal.]

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Babu @ Ishak, sought suspension of his sentence after being convicted under the N.D.P.S. Act and sentenced by the Special Judge. His first bail application was dismissed. He argued that the contraband was below commercial quantity and that he had been in custody since March 2019.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the circumstances warranted the suspension of the sentence, considering the duration of custody and the nature of the contraband involved.

Issues: Whether the sentence should be suspended pending the appeal, given the appellant's arguments regarding the quantity of contraband and the time spent in custody.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty justified the suspension of the sentence, especially in light of the appellant's prolonged detention and the nature of the offense.

Result: The court allowed the application for suspension of the sentence, subject to conditions including the deposit of a fine and the execution of a personal bond.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. -This is the second application seeking suspension of sentence. The first bail application preferred by the appellant No.1-Babu @ Ishak was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 23.03.2021.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the record of the case.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. The accused-appellant is in judicial lockup since 13.03.2019 and the hearing of case will take long considerable time to be concluded. Therefore, the sentence awarded to the appellant may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal.

4. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellant.

5. Accordingly, the present second application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act Cases, Pratapgarh, vide judgment dated 10.12.2020 in Special Sessions Case No.17/2019 against the appellant-applicant Babu @ Ishak S/o Sh. Allahrakh, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail subject to deposit the fine amount as imposed by the learned trial Court, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 20.10.2021 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

    1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. Appellant shall deposit the fine amount as imposed by the learned trial Court.

5. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top