HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
MANI SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
CRLAS / 341 / 2025
Decided On : 06-03-2025
(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 430(2) - Suspension of sentence - Application for suspension allowed due to the recovered contraband being below commercial quantity and the appellant being on bail during trial - Court found it a fit case for suspension pending appeal. (Paras 5-6)
(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Appellant required to execute a personal bond and provide sureties, with specific conditions for appearance and notification of address changes. (Paras 6)
Facts of the case:
The appeal concerns the suspension of sentence awarded to two appellants in a case under the NDPS Act, where the contraband recovered was below commercial quantity, and they had been on bail during trial.
Findings of Court:
The court determined that the suspension of sentence was appropriate given the circumstances of the case, allowing the appellants to remain on bail pending the appeal's outcome.
Issues: The main issues were whether the sentence should be suspended and the conditions for granting bail to the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the circumstances warranted suspension of the sentence, emphasizing the importance of the recovered quantity of contraband and the appellants' prior bail status.
Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.
ORDER :
MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.
1. Heard.
2. Admit. Issue Notice.
3. Learned AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State.
4. Heard on application for suspension of sentence No.321/2025.
5. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that the recovered contraband was below commercial quantity. The appellant(s) was/were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).
6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 (2) BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, District Hanumangarh vide judgment dated 10.02.2025 in Sessions Case No.33/2018 against the appellant-applicant(s) – 1. Mani Singh S/o Shri Gurdev Singh and 2. Smt. Amarjeet Kaur W/o Shri Mani Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 15.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court ruled that a sentence may be suspended if the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and the appellant was on bail during the trial.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused demonstrates that the contraband is below commercial quantity and was on bail during trial.
Suspension of sentence justified when appellant on bail during trial and contraband is below commercial quantity, emphasizing lengthy appeal process.
The court allowed the suspension of sentence pending appeal based on the absence of custody and prior temporary suspension, imposing conditions for bail.
Suspension of sentence is warranted when petitioners are on bail during trial and there is no immediate hearing for the appeal.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused was on bail during trial and if the appeal is unlikely to be heard soon.
Suspension of sentence granted pending revision due to prior bail status and expected duration of hearing, subject to conditions.
Suspension of sentence granted due to contraband being below commercial quantity and appellants' prior bail status, with conditions for bail and appearance.
The court established that the suspension of a sentence can be granted when the accused has been in custody for a significant period and the nature of the offense does not involve a commercial quanti....
Suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is warranted when appellants were on bail during trial and appeal hearing is not imminent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.