SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 14

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
MANI SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
CRLAS / 341 / 2025
Decided On : 06-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Achala Ram, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

The court ruled that a sentence may be suspended if the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and the appellant was on bail during the trial.

Headnote:

(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 430(2) - Suspension of sentence - Application for suspension allowed due to the recovered contraband being below commercial quantity and the appellant being on bail during trial - Court found it a fit case for suspension pending appeal. (Paras 5-6)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Appellant required to execute a personal bond and provide sureties, with specific conditions for appearance and notification of address changes. (Paras 6)

Facts of the case:
The appeal concerns the suspension of sentence awarded to two appellants in a case under the NDPS Act, where the contraband recovered was below commercial quantity, and they had been on bail during trial.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the suspension of sentence was appropriate given the circumstances of the case, allowing the appellants to remain on bail pending the appeal's outcome.

Issues: The main issues were whether the sentence should be suspended and the conditions for granting bail to the appellants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the circumstances warranted suspension of the sentence, emphasizing the importance of the recovered quantity of contraband and the appellants' prior bail status.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1. Heard.

2. Admit. Issue Notice.

3. Learned AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State.

4. Heard on application for suspension of sentence No.321/2025.

5. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that the recovered contraband was below commercial quantity. The appellant(s) was/were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 (2) BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, District Hanumangarh vide judgment dated 10.02.2025 in Sessions Case No.33/2018 against the appellant-applicant(s) – 1. Mani Singh S/o Shri Gurdev Singh and 2. Smt. Amarjeet Kaur W/o Shri Mani Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 15.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top