SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 6

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
SHRAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 381 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Shaitan Singh Khichar, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat, Asst. to Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG

Suspension of sentence justified when appellant on bail during trial and contraband is below commercial quantity, emphasizing lengthy appeal process.

Headnote:(A) NDPS Act - Section 430 - Suspension of sentence - The appellant was on bail during trial, and the recovered contraband was below commercial quantity - The court found it appropriate to suspend the sentence considering the lengthy appeal process - Bail granted on conditions including personal bond and attendance at trial court. (Paras 6-8)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The appellant must provide a personal bond and ensure attendance before the trial court annually until the appeal is decided. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted and sentenced by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act, and the appeal is pending. The contraband involved was below commercial quantity, and the appellant was on bail during trial.

Findings of Court:
The court deemed it a fit case for suspension of sentence and granted bail with specific conditions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended given the circumstances of the case and the nature of the contraband.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the suspension of sentence was justified due to the appellant's bail status during trial and the nature of the contraband, emphasizing the lengthy appeal process as a relevant factor.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1.Heard.

2. Admit.

3. Issue notice.

4. Learned Asst. to Addl. Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of sole respondent.

5. Heard on application of suspension of sentence No.357/2025.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant was on bail during the trial and the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity.

7. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant was on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal will take sufficient long time, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant.

8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, ( NDPS Act Cases) No.2, Jodhpur, vide judgment dated 17.02.2025 in Sessions Case No.21/2023 (104/2012) against the appellant-applicant Shrawan Kumar S/o Shri Arjunram Vishnoi shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he will be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in the court on 04.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

9. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top