Back
VIJAY BISHNOI
Gaurav Maheshwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.
2. The petitioner has been arrested in the following FIRs for the following offences :-
| CRLMB No. |
| ||
| FIR No. | Police Station | Offences punishable u/S. |
|
| 10832/2021 | 179/2019 | Sadar Kotwali, Jodhpur | 420 and 406 IPC |
| 10833/2021 | 51/2020 | Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur | 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC |
| 10834/2021 | 329/2019 | Sardarpura, Jodhpur | 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC |
| 6842/2021 | 556/2019 | Udaimandir, Jodhpur | 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC |
| 10658/2021 | 421/2020 | Pratapnagar, Jodhpur | 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 472 IPC |
| 10659/2021 | 178/2019 | Sadar Kotwali, Jodhpur | 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC |
| 10660/2021 | 236/2019 | Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur | 420 and 467 IPC |
3. The petitioner has preferred these second bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegations levelled in the impugned FIRs except one FIR are similar in nature and in all those FIRs, after investigation, charge-sheets have been filed against the petitioner. It is also submitted that the earlier bail applicatio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
