RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
Ex-Ct/gd, Mahavir Prasad - Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3114 of 2009
Decided On : 04-02-2023
Disciplinary - Misconduct - Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 10(m), 11(1) - The court interpreted Sections 10(m) and 11(1) of the Act, affirming that dismissal is permissible for serious misconduct, even if not proven in criminal court, emphasizing the distinct standards of proof in disciplinary proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Constable in the CRPF, faced dismissal after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of grave misconduct for failing to report for duty and involvement in a criminal case regarding the death of his wife. He challenged the dismissal in court.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the dismissal, confirming that the charges of misconduct were proven and that the disciplinary authority acted within its powers under the Act, despite the petitioner's acquittal in the criminal case.
Issues: Whether dismissal can be imposed under Section 11(1) of the Act 1949, and whether acquittal in a criminal case absolves the petitioner from disciplinary charges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that Section 11(1) allows for dismissal as a punishment and that acquittal in a criminal case does not negate findings of misconduct in disciplinary proceedings, which require a lower standard of proof.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
ORDER
1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this court, the petitioner has submitted this petition seeking the following reliefs :-
(ii) Any other appropriate order which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.'
2. The background facts need to be noted, in brief are that the petitioner as a Constable joined duties on 12.6.2004 in the Central Reserve Police Force (for short 'CRPF') in Srinagar.
3. A departmental inquiry was ordered against the petitioner under Section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 (for short 'Act 1949') read with Rule 27 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 (for short 'Rules 1955') vide Office Orders dated 11.9.2007 and 8.10.2007 with following charges :-
'That No. 041598499 CT/GD Mahavir Prasad of A/118 Bn, CRPF while functioning as CT/GD committed an act of gross misconduct and disobedience or orders in his capacity as a member of the Force under section 11(1) of CRPF Act, 1949 read with rule 27 of CRPF Rules, 1955 in that he proceeded on 60 days EL with 15 days PL w.e.f. 17/2/2007 to 2/5/2007 and on expiry of sanctioned leave he was to report for duty on 2.5.2007 evening roll call but he failed to do so and overstaying from leave w.e.f. 3/5/2007 (FN) to date without prior permission/sanction from the competent authority despite of orders/directions to report for duty forthwith, which is prejudicial to good orders and discipline of the Force, thus he has committed an act of misconduct in the capacity of a member of the Force.'
ARTICLE-II
'That No. 041598499 CT/GD Mahavir Prasad of A/118 Bn, CRPF while functioning as CT/GD committed an act of gross misconduct in his capacity as a member of the Force under Section 11(1) of CRPF Act, 1949 read with rule 27 of CRPF Rules, 1955 in that he, while availing 60 days EL with 15 days PL w.e.f. 17/2/2007 to 2/5/2007 allegedly involved in criminal ACT by torturing and killing his wife Smt. Anuradha (Bittu) for dowry. A criminal case against him was registered vide FIR no. 183/2007 under PS Shahpur, Dist-Jaipur (Rajasthan) and was arrested on 8/4/2007, and was taken into judicial custody in SubJail, Kotputli, Dist-Jaipur (Rajasthan) since then as per report of SP, District Jaipur (Rural), Jaipur vide letter No. 13382-85 dated 11/6/2007 and No. 23924 dated 1/9/2007. Further, the aforesaid CT/GD Mahavir Prasad did not inform the competent authority about his detention. Thus the aforesaid CT/GD Mahavir Prasad concealed the above facts and did not maintain absolute integrity and committed an act of moral turpitude and grave misconduct which is unbecoming of a member of the disciplined Force.'
4. The memorandum along with statement of article of charges along with list of witnesses, was served upon the petitioner. After giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the following facts of the case were brought out in the departmental inquiry proceedings :-
(ii) No.041598499 CT/GD Mahavir Prasad of A/118 Bn, CRPF while he was on 60 days EL with 15 days PL from 17/02/07 to 02/05/07, a criminal case against said CT/GD Mahavir Prasad was registered under section 304B, 398A IPC vide FIR No.183/2007 under P.S.-Shahpur, Dist-Jaipur(Rajasthan) and the said CT/GD was arrested on 8/4/2007 and detained in Sub-Jail, Kotputli, Dist-Jaipur since released on bail on 25/11/200
Ajit Kumar Nag vs. General Manager (PJ.), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Central Industrial Security Force and Ors vs. Abrar Ali (2017) 4 SCC 507
Dattatraya Mahadev Nadkarni (Dr.) vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (1993) II LLJ 813 SC
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Sarvesh Berry (2005) 10 SCC 471 : 2005 SCC (Cri.) 1605)
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan vs. T. Srinivas
Noida Entrepreneurs Association vs. NOIDA & Ors (2007) 10 SCC 385
Tata Cellular vs. Union of India
Teri Oat Estates (P) Ltd. vs. U.T., Chandigarh
Union of India & Ors vs. Diler Singh (2016) 13 SCC 71
Union of India (UOI) and Ors vs. Dalbir Singh (2021) 11 SCC 321
Union of India and Ors. vs. Ghulam Mohd. Bhat (2005) 13 SCC 228
Uttaranchal RTC vs. Mansaram Nainwal (2006) 6 SCC 366 : (2006) SCC (L&S) 1341
The dismissal of a police officer based on departmental proceedings was unjustified as the charges were not proven, and acquittal in criminal proceedings must be considered.
The court held that a disciplinary dismissal based on unproven charges is unjustified, especially when the employee is acquitted in related criminal proceedings.
Acquittal in criminal proceedings does not negate the authority's power to impose disciplinary action when misconduct is proven by preponderance of probabilities.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.