SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, KULDEEP MATHUR
GVPR Engineers Limited, through its Authorized signatory Mr. Kamal Hindonia, son of Sh. Madan Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through Chief Engineer (Project) Public Health Engineering Department – Respondent
ORDER :
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) :
GVPR Engineers Limited is aggrieved by the order dated 29th July 2024 by which S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12533/2024 has been dismissed observing as under:-
2. The appellant-firm has pleaded that pursuant to NIB dated 2nd February 2022 for supply of drinking water to 306 villages in the District of Jalore under the Jal Jeeva
ABL International Ltd. & Ors. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd.
Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Kerala State Electricity Board and Anr. v. Kurien K. Kalathil and Ors
M.P. Power Management Company Ltd. Jabalpur v. Sky Power South East Solar India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Madras Aluminum Company Ltd. v. Tamilnadu Electricity Board & Anr.
Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation & Ors.
State of Gujarat through Chief Secretary and Anr. v. Amber Builders
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Bridge & Roof Company (India) Ltd.
Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry
Unitech Ltd. & Ors. v. Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation & Ors.
Writ petitions in contractual matters are maintainable if state action is arbitrary, and contractual provisions must be strictly followed regarding deductions and dispute resolution.
Writ jurisdiction cannot be used solely for granting interim relief. Disputed factual matters are not within the purview of writ jurisdiction.
The existence of an arbitration clause in the agreement does not ipso facto render a writ petition not maintainable. The High Court may still exercise its writ jurisdiction in exceptional circumstanc....
The court upheld the binding nature of the contract, ruling that the Plaintiff's claims were untenable due to failure to exercise contractual options and were barred by limitation.
The power to issue prerogative writs under Article 226 of the Constitution is not limited by any other provisions of the Constitution. The High Court has the discretion to entertain or not to enterta....
The scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited to reasons of law and pertains to the arbitral tribunal's adherence to the contract terms and evidence presented.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.