SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 970

SAMEER JAIN
Krishna Kumawat W/o Shri Gopal Lal Jat – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Dinesh Pareek, Vijendra Yadav, Nitin Kumar Sharma, Bheem Sain Bairwa, B.R. Rana, David Mehla, Sumit Kumar Jain, Deepak Khandelwal, Yogesh Singhal, Ritesh Jain, Gurvindra Singh, Tanay Jain, Prakash Chand Thakuriya, Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Shivendra Singh Rathore, Asgar Khan, Lakhan Singh Tomar, Laxmi Narayan Saini, Pradeep Sharma, Arvind Sharma, Gajender Singh Rathore, Sunita Meena, Rakesh Kumar Rajwania, Siya Ram Sharma, Ghanshyam Sharma, Ayush Pathak, Santosh Kumar Yogi, Yunus Khan, Hari Narayan Kumawat, Buddhi Prakash Meena, Vikash Kumar Jakhar, Raj Kumar Kasana, Gitesh Joshi, Vinod Kumar Singhal, Brijesh Kumar Bhardwaj, Vandana Chauhan, Ravindra Kumar Paliwal, Pallav Choudhary, Amit Dadhich, Vidhut Kumar Gupta, Dharmendra Sharma, Ripu Daman Singh Naruka, Kuldeep Aswal, Omveer Singh Saini, Ashwani Kumar Kushwah, Naveen Dhuwan, Anshuman Saxena, Sudhir Yadav, Anuroop Singhi, O.P. Pareek, Dharmendra Joshi, Shailender Singh Balwada, Brahma Nand Sandu, Parth Sarthi Sandu, Dinesh Chand Sharma, Rajveer Singh Jat, Aditya Mishra, Chhaya Sharma, Tapeshwar Pal Singh Parmar, Fahad Hasan, J K Moolchandani, T.N. Sharma, Amit Ratnawat, D.S. Dhariwal, Hemant Kankoriya, Meeta Pareek, Nirmala Kushwah, Ram Niwas Saini, Babulal Jogi, Rajendra Prasad Yadav, Jitendra Singh Shekhawat, Nirmal Kumar Nagar, Anoop Kumar, K.K. Bhinda, Martand Pratap Singh, B.R. Choudhary, Ravinder Kumar, Manish Sharma, D.S. Bagadia, Ravindra Kumar Tomar, Arvind Balaut, Bal Ram Vashisth, Rohit Sharma, Vishram Prajapati, Mohammad Shahid Hassan, Anil Kumar Jain, Ravi Saini, Rahul Sinsinwar, Garvit Khandelwal, Praveen Kumar Jain, Timan Singh, Kamal Kant Vyas, Sandeep Kumar Maheshwari, Madhumita Das, Anil Jain, Dhruv Tailor, Govind Prasad Rawat, Mukesh Pal Jadoun, Sageer Ahmed, Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi, A.R. Meena, Abdul Samad, Girraj Prasad Bairwa, Kuldeep Sharma, Avinash Choudhary, Devendra Kumar Chauhan, Nidhi Khandelwal, Satish Kumar Khandal, Mohar Pal Meena, Bheem Singh Dabla, R.S. Bhardwaj, Chain Singh Rathore, Kapil Sharma, Shamsul Aarefin, Liyakat Khan, Manish K. Saini, Girish Khandelwal, Takhat Singh, Praveen Sharma, Khushboo Kothari, Babu Lal Bairwa, Kavish Dubey, Veerendra Singh, Ravindra Singh Shekhawat, Naresh Sharma, Krishan Pratap Singh, Farooq Ahmed, Chandrahas Choudhary, Swati Tank, Manoj Kumar, Kamlesh Roj, Chitrank Sharma, Malkhan Chaturvedi, Arpan Kumar Sharma, Govind Lal Choudhary, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Anupam Sharma, Mukesh Dudi, Ravi Shanker Sharma, Anuradha, Karanpal Singh, Lalit Kumar, Mukesh Kumar Meena, Vivek Gaur, Sandeep Sharma, Manoj Kumar Avasthi, Amit Mathur, Sikander Ali Chopdar, Ashish Saxena, Ali Mohammed Khan, Rupesh Jain, Yogesh Pujari, Virendra Prajapat, Sukhraj Singh Rathore, Govind Gupta, Aslam S. Khan, Mohit Khandelwal, Jitendra Jain, Krishan Kumar Chhawal, Ram Babu Khandelwal, Ramdhan Choudhary, Manoj Kumar Dixit, Chetna Sharma, Pallav Sharma, Rahul Patni, Nikhil Saini, Prashant Kumar Sharma, Sumer Singh Ola, Arvind Mahawar, Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Mahendra Kumar Naharwal, Arshad Khan, Sanjay Khan, Surendar Meel, Mahesh Sharma, Mohammed Zubeir, Govind Upadhyay, Dinesh Pareek, Aman Ali, Amrit Prasad Sharma, Navankur Dubey, R.B. Sharma Ganthola.
For the Respondents: Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, Vishram Prajapati, Krishan Chander Sharma, Vaibav Pancholi, Pawan Sharma, Arvind Mahawar, Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Yenu Satyan, Jai Kishan Yogi, Vimal Kumar Jatav, Arshad Khan, Sanjay Khan, Sandeep Kumar Meena, V.P. Singh Bairwa, Mukesh Dudi.

ORDER :

1. Considering the identical issue of facts and interwoven prayers, on the directions of the Court, a bunch of matters was listed today. The instant petitions is/are either filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Section 528 of B.N.S.S. or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking protection from the State authorities (police authorities), qua the married couples/live-in relationship couples/senior citizens/individuals, who are/had facing/faced threats of extra-legal harassment and/or violence at the hands of their family members/ relatives/social actors or groups.

2. In this regard, learned counsel for the State has relied upon the ‘paragraph no. 30’ of the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena and Another Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others and has submitted that in the said order categorical directions are spelled out, qua the filing of representation before the three tier authorities i.e. foremost before the police officer who shall be designated as the ‘Nodal Officer’ thereafter, if aggrieved/ unsatisfied then before the concerned Superintendent of Police and if still the lis in question is not settled, then be

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top