SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 981

SAMEER JAIN
Dholi W/o Shri Leela Ram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mamraj Jat, Fahad Hasan, Manish Gupta, Arafat Hussain, Anshuman Saxena, Suresh Kumar, Swaraj Panwar, Mohd. Aslam, R.D.S. Naruka, Dharmendra Joshi, Bhrigu Sharma, Ashinder Gautam, Vijendra Yadav, M.S. Raghav, Kaleem Ahamad Khan, Amit Jindal, Gitesh Joshi, Lalit Sharma, Prahlad Sharma, Bheem Singh Dabla, Neeraj Sharma, Jagmohan Bhardwaj, Mahendra Sharma, Yunush Khan, Bheem Singh Dabla, Vishram Prajapati, S.S. Shekhawat, R.K. Paliwal, Kapil Sharma, Pushpendra Kumar Pandey, Hitesh Mishra, Girraj Prasad Bairwa, Girish Khandelwal, Vinod Kumar, Umesh Vyas, Rajesh Kumar Sain, Rakesh Prajapat, Pooja Kumari Mundotia, Shamsuddin Ansari, Mahendra Shandilya, Sunil Tyagi, Anil Jain, Buddhi Prakash Meena, Vikash Kumar Jakhar, Ajay Sharma, Sandeep Kumar Sharma, Abhinav Gupta, S.K. Singodiya, Mahendra Singh Gothwal, Anubha Singh, Kalesh Kumari, Manish Kumar, Chitrank Sharma, Ajatshatru Mina, Apeksha Tiwari, Rajat Choudhary, Swadheen Singh, Ashish Devessar, Zunaid Khan, Asgar Khandelwal, Javed Mohd. Khan, Sumer Chand Sharma, Poonam Chand Sharma, Pradeep Sharma, Sumit Khandelwal, S. Gharana, P.C. Thakuriya, Rajesh Kumar Sain, Shyamsunder Varma, Abdul Rahim Khan.
For the Respondents: Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, Manvendra Singh, R.R. Goyal, Mukesh Meena, Pradeep Kumar, Deshraj Kalwania, Virendra Singh, Vikram Singh, V.B. Sharma, Adhiraj Singh Rajawat, R.B. Sharma (Ganthola), S.P. Singh, Hans Raj Kuldeep, Yuvraj Samant, D.K. Garg, Ajay Singh, Bhim Singh Meena, Brahm Singh Gurjar, Mohar Pal Meena, Mamoon Khalid, Gaurav Sharma, Amit Ratnawat, Samrath Sharma, Mukesh Sharma, Mohit Khandelwal, Prem Shanker Sharma, Jagmeet Singh, Abhay Singh Rathore, Abhishek B. Sharma, Gaurav Gupta, Prashant Daga, O.P. Mishra, Pankaj Gupta, Mahander Meena, S.L. Sharma, Rahul Sharma, Rajneesh Gupta.

ORDER :

1. Considering the identical issue of facts and interwoven prayers, on the directions of the Court, a bunch of matters was listed today. The instant petitions is/are either filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Section 528 of B.N.S.S. or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking protection from the State authorities (police authorities), qua the married couples/live-in relationship couples/senior citizens/individuals, who are/had facing/faced threats of extra-legal harassment and/or violence at the hands of their family members/ relatives/social actors or groups.

2. In this regard, learned counsel for the State has relied upon the ‘paragraph no. 30’ of the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena and Another Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others and has submitted that in the said order categorical directions are spelled out, qua the filing of representation before the three tier authorities i.e. foremost before the police officer who shall be designated as the ‘Nodal Officer’ thereafter, if aggrieved/unsatisfied then before the concerned Superintendent of Police and if still the lis in question is not settled, then bef

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top