Naveen Soni vs State - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 1698

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1698

FARJAND ALI
Naveen Soni – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Abhishek Mehta.
For the Respondent: Gaurav Singh, P.P. and Arun Dadhich.

Table of Content
1. requirement for a speaking order in trial courts. (Para 1)
2. disregard of court orders is contemptuous. (Para 2)
3. extension of interim orders in pending cases. (Para 4)
4. future hearing scheduled. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT :

Farjand Ali, J.

In an earlier round of litigation, when the learned trial court framed charges by a very cryptic, mechanical and non-speaking order, the petitioner moved a revision petition before this court, which came to be allowed by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 08.03.2019 with a specific direction to the trial court to pass an appropriate and speaking order of framing charge, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties and taking into consideration the evidence available on record. The operative part of the order is felt appropriate to be reproduced herein below :—

“In view of above, the order impugned dated 11.01.2019 passed by the learned trial Court is set aside and the case is remanded back to the trial court with the direction to pass an appropriate and speaking order of framing charge, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties and taking into consid