SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1841

ARUN BHANSALI, RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Ritu Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Akshay Nagori.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sandeep Saruparia with Mr. Nikhil Ajmera.

ORDER :

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 07.01.2023 passed by the Family Court, Rajsamand, whereby the application filed by the appellant under section 25 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 ('the Act'), has been rejected.

2. The application was filed by the appellant with the submissions that the respondent - husband of the appellant had filed an application under Section 13 of the Act seeking dissolution of marriage at Family Court, Udaipur on 15.01.2015, which came to be transferred to Family Court, Rajsamand.

3. In the said petition, the appellant filed a counter claim and sought restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Act. The petition filed by the respondent was decided on 12.04.2017, wherein the petition seeking dissolution of marriage was dismissed and the application filed by the appellant seeking restitution of conjugal rights was allowed.

4. It was, inter-alia, claimed that the appellant was married to the respondent, they have a son Harshal and the appellant is living at her parental home at Kankroli since March, 2012. It was further indicated that despite the decree passed by the Family Court under Section 9 of the Act on 12.04.2017,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top