SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1731

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Parmanand – Appellant
Versus
Manbhar Devi Meena – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ramanuj Sharma, Advocate.

ORDER :

Avneesh Jhingan, J.

This petition is filed seeking quashing of order dated 15.11.2022 dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

2. The brief facts are that the respondent on 28.11.2018 sought eviction on account of non-payment of rent by filing petition under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short 'the Act of 2001') at Jaipur. During the pendency of the proceedings, petitioner filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 claiming that there is no tenant-landlord relationship between the parties and as per the report of the Investigating Officer in FIR No. 429/2018 registered at Police Station Vishwakarma, the land in question is Government land. The application was rejected considering that there is rent deed between the parties and the issue as to whether there is landlord-tenant relationship, is to be decided in the main petition and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Sections 2 & 3 of the Act of 2001 do not apply in the facts of the present case as the Investigating Officer has prepared a report that the land in question was not owned by the respondent. He further submits that there is no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top