SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2331

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ashvin Garg, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

ORDER :

Mr. Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.227/2022 registered at Police Station Mandhan, District Alwar (Police District Bhiwadi) for the offence under Section 376 IPC and later on for the offence under Section 376 (2)(n) IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case wherein, the FIR has been lodged by a major married lady of 24 years of age after a delay of more than two and half years from the date of alleged offence. Inviting attention of this Court towards the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., he submits that no reason has been assigned for inordinate delay in lodging the FIR. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2022, charge sheet has been filed, trial of the case will take time, he has no criminal antecedents and prays for his release on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of allegations against him, the material contained in the charg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top