SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1176

SUDESH BANSAL
Mahendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rohit Khandelwal
For the Respondent: Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

ORDER :

Mr. Sudesh Bansal, J. - Instant petition has been filed by petitioner under Section 482 CrPC, challenging the order dated 01.04.2024 passed in case No.51/2024 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar whereby application to release the mobile phone of petitioner seized in connection with FIR No.99/2023 registered at Police Station Dug, District Jhalawar under Section 341, 307, 324, 326 411 and 120B IPC and Sections 5/27, 3/25, 5/25 of the Arms Act, has been dismissed.

2. Heard counsel for parties and perused the material available on record.

3. Counsel for petitioner submits that during investigation in the aforesaid FIR, mobile phone Android One Note Plus Note CE 5G of petitioner has been seized. Now the investigation is complete and the mobile is laying in custody of the police for no use. If there is any connecting or incriminating evidence is in the mobile, the data of the same can be saved, but mobile instrument may be released to petitioner on supurdgi as in absence of same, petitioner is facing hardship in performing his day to day workings. Reliance has been placed on Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat [(2002) 10 SCC 283].

4. Learned P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top