Back
FARJAND ALI
Vikas Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final conclusion and order. (Para 1 , 10) |
| 2. details of the case and conviction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding sentence reduction. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on trial and sentencing. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. modification of sentence while affirming conviction. (Para 9) |
ORDER :
Farjand Ali, J.
The criminal revision petition is barred by limitation from 349 days. The petitioner is in custody. The revision petition has been filed by a counsel appointed by the Rajasthan High Court Legal Services Committee. An application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT has been filed. For the grounds and reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. The revision petition be treated to be filed within limitation.
2. The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 of the CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved of the judgment dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Nohar, District Hanumangarh in Criminal Appeal No.88/2018, dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment dated 05.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistr
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to duration already served, considering the long trial, the petitioner's age, and societal status.
The court emphasized the importance of considering personal circumstances and prior incarceration when determining the appropriateness of a sentence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
