Vikas Kumar vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2044

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2044

FARJAND ALI
Vikas Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nishit Shah.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The criminal revision petition is barred by limitation from 349 days. The petitioner is in custody. The revision petition has been filed by a counsel appointed by the Rajasthan High Court Legal Services Committee. An application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT has been filed. For the grounds and reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. The revision petition be treated to be filed within limitation.

2. The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 of the CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved of the judgment dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Nohar, District Hanumangarh in Criminal Appeal No.88/2018, dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment dated 05.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nohar in Criminal Original Case No.687/2017, whereby he was convicted for the offences under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC and for each count, sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of 3 years along with a fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple

Click Here to Read the rest of this document