FARJAND ALI
Shahrukh Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
Farjand Ali, J.
The instant criminal revision petition is barred by limitation from 409 days. An application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT has been preferred seeking condonation of delay. For the grounds and reasons mentioned therein, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. The same be treated to be filed within limitation.
2. An application has been filed seeking correction in the order dated 28.07.2023, wherein indavertently name of the trial court has been mentioned as "Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara" instead of "Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara". The correction sought for is essential, therefore, it is ordered that the name of the trial court mentioned in para 4 of the order dated 28.07.2023 shall be read as "Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara" instead of "Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara".
3. Looking to the nature of offence and other facts and circumstances of the case, with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, the revision petition itself is being heard and decided today itself.
4. The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /4
Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra (2012) 2 SCC 648
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to duration already served, considering the long trial, the petitioner's age, and societal status.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.