SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2151

FARJAND ALI
Shahrukh Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Devendra Sanwlot, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition is barred by limitation from 409 days. An application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT has been preferred seeking condonation of delay. For the grounds and reasons mentioned therein, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. The same be treated to be filed within limitation.

2. An application has been filed seeking correction in the order dated 28.07.2023, wherein indavertently name of the trial court has been mentioned as "Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara" instead of "Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara". The correction sought for is essential, therefore, it is ordered that the name of the trial court mentioned in para 4 of the order dated 28.07.2023 shall be read as "Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara" instead of "Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara".

3. Looking to the nature of offence and other facts and circumstances of the case, with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, the revision petition itself is being heard and decided today itself.

4. The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top