Shahrukh Khan vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2151

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2151

FARJAND ALI
Shahrukh Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Devendra Sanwlot, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

Table of Content
1. details of conviction and charges (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments for sentence reduction (Para 7 , 8)
3. court’s consideration for sentencing (Para 9 , 10)
4. modification of sentence concluded (Para 11 , 12)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition is barred by limitation from 409 days. An application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT has been preferred seeking condonation of delay. For the grounds and reasons mentioned therein, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. The same be treated to be filed within limitation.

2. An application has been filed seeking correction in the order dated 28.07.2023, wherein indavertently name of the trial court has been mentioned as "Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara" instead of "Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara". The correction sought for is essential, therefore, it is ordered that the name of the trial court mentioned in para 4 of the order dated 28.07.2023 shall be read as "Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara" instead of "Judicial Magistrate, District Banswara".

3. Looking to the nature of offence and other facts and circumstances of the case, wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document