Rajesh @ Raju vs State Of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2108

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2108

FARJAND ALI
Rajesh @ Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nishit Shah.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The criminal revision petition is barred by limitation from 7 days. An application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT has been filed. For the grounds and reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. The revision petition be treated to be filed within limitation.

2. The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 of the Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved of the judgment dated 10.05.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.6, Bikaner in Criminal Appeal No.20/2023, whereby the learned appellate court while affirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offences under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC as recorded by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner in Criminal Original Case No.8405/2022, reduced the sentence for each offence from 3 years' rigorous imprisonment to 2 years' rigorous imprisonment, while maintaining the fine amount of Rs.1,000/- and default sentence of 1 month's simple imprisonment and it was further ordered that the sentences shall run concurrently.

3. Bereft of elaborate details, facts relevant and essential

Click Here to Read the rest of this document