SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2038

FARJAND ALI
Naru Lal @ Nariya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Rajni Mathur and Mr. Sanjay Mathur
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 of the CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved of the judgment dated 03.03.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Udaipur in Criminal Appeal No.42/2011, dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment dated 25.10.2010 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vallabhnagar, District Udaipur in Criminal Original Case No.216/2004, whereby he was convicted for the offences under Sections 454 and 380 of the IPC and for each count, sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 3 years along with a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment of 3 months.

2. Bereft of elaborate details, facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant criminal revision are that complainant Mohanlal Jat, resident of Amarpur submitted a written report at the Police Station Kheroda on 30.07.2004 to the effect that on that day at 10 a.m., he went to his well after locking his room and when he came back at around 01.00 p.m., the lock was broken and a boy came running out. An amount of Rs.9800/- was stolen. The bo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top