Naru Lal @ Nariya vs State Of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2038

FARJAND ALI
Naru Lal @ Nariya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Rajni Mathur and Mr. Sanjay Mathur
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA

Table of Content
1. outline of the appeal and background of the case. (Para 1)
2. details of the original case and charges. (Para 2)
3. arguments for leniency due to duration and circumstances. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's rationale for maintaining conviction but considering sentence. (Para 6 , 7)
5. modification of the sentence based on justice principles. (Para 8)
6. conclusion allowing part of the revision petition. (Para 9)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 of the CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved of the judgment dated 03.03.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Udaipur in Criminal Appeal No.42/2011, dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment dated 25.10.2010 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vallabhnagar, District Udaipur in Criminal Original Case No.216/2004, whereby he was convicted for the offences under Sections 454 and 380 of the IPC and for each count, sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 3 years along with a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment of 3 months.

2. Bereft of elaborate details,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document