Daulat Singh Chouhan vs State Of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2037

FARJAND ALI
Daulat Singh Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.R. Ankiya
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA and Mr. Hitesh Kumar

Table of Content
1. conviction and sentencing details under section 138 of n.i. act. (Para 2 , 3)
2. parties reached a compromise; the offence is compoundable. (Para 4)
3. review of case records and compromise deed. (Para 5)
4. imposition of costs due to misuse of court time. (Para 6)
5. quashing of conviction based on compromise; cost imposed. (Para 7)
6. petitioner's release from custody; bail bonds discharged. (Para 8)
7. disposal of stay petition. (Para 9)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant revision petition is barred by limitation from 875 days. For the reasons mentioned in the application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT and also looking to the fact that the parties have arrived at a compromise and settled their dispute, the application seeking condonation of delay is accepted. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court for challenging the judgment dated 24.09.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Bhilwara in Criminal Appeal No.15/2018 affirming the judgment dated 15.12.2017 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, NI Act Cases, No.2, Bhilwara in Criminal Case No.1695/2016, whereby, the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document