SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2116

FARJAND ALI
Lehara Ram – Appellant
Versus
Himata Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shambhoo Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA, Mr. Dinesh Bishnoi.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The petitioner has approached this Court for challenging the judgment dated 29.04.2023 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalore in Cr. Appeal No.84/2021 affirming the judgment dated 16.06.2015 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Jalore in Regular Criminal Case No.2137/2013 whereby, the petitioner was convicted for the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a fine of Rs.2,70,000/- was imposed upon him and it was ordered that in default of payment of fine, the petitioner would undergo simple imprisonment of two months.

2. Briefly stated, that facts of the case are that the petitioner was prosecuted for committing an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After completion of trial, he was found guilty and thus, was convicted and sentenced by the learned trial Court. The judgment of conviction was assailed by the petitioner by way of filing a criminal appeal but the same has been dismissed vide judgment dated 29.04.2023, hence the present revision petition has been filed.

3. The parties have entered into a compromise and have settled the dispute amicably. Copy of Compromise deed dated 09

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top