SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2120

FARJAND ALI
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Saharan
For the Respondent: Mr. S.S. Rajpurohit, P.P.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

An application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for condonation of delay.

2. For the reasons and grounds mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.

3. The delay of 146 days in filing the instant criminal revision petition is condoned.

4. Let the instant revision be treated within limitation.

5. The petitioner has approached this Court for challenging the judgment dated 10.01.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.01, Sriganganagar in Cr. Appeal No.20/2019 (CIS No.208/2019) affirming the judgment dated 08.07.2019 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases) No.1, Sriganganagar in Criminal Case No.520/2017 whereby, the petitioner was convicted for the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced to two years' simple imprisonment and further ordered to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.13,50,000/- to the complainant.

6. Briefly stated, that facts of the case are that the petitioner was prosecuted for committing an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After completion of trial, he was found guilty and thus, was con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top