SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2345

KULDEEP MATHUR
Shyam Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Kuldeep Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Kumar, P.P. Mr. Ramdev Rajpurohit

ORDER :

Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The instant revision petition is barred by limitation from 404 days. For the reasons mentioned in the application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT and also looking to the fact that the parties have arrived at a compromise and settled their dispute, the application seeking condonation of delay is accepted. The delay in filing the revision petition is condoned.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court for challenging the judgment dated 30.05.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Sri. Ganganagar in Criminal Appeal No.06/2021 affirming the judgment dated 27.01.2021 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases) No.2, Sri. Ganganagar in Criminal Regular Case No.381/2016, whereby, the petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and further ordered to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the complainant.

3. Briefly stated, that facts of the case are that the petitioner was prosecuted for committing an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After completion of trial, he was found

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top