Dhanna Ram vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2096

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2096

FARJAND ALI
Dhanna Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajiv Bishnoi Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

JUDGMENT :

Farjand Ali, J.

By way of filing this Criminal Revision Petition challenge has been made to the judgment dated 29.10.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Rajsamand in Criminal appeal No.21/2002, whereby the learned appellate court affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31.05.2000 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate (First class), Rajsamand in Criminal Regular Case No.308/1996; whereby the petitioners have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Offence for which convicted	Sentence, fine and default sentence
Section 458 of the IPC	One year's simple imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo fifteen days' simple imprisonment
Section 323 of the IPC	One month simple imprisonment
Section 504 of the IPC	One month simple imprisonment

2. Bereft of elaborate details, facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant criminal revision petitions are that on 10.07.1996, complainant Mohan Balai submitted a report to the SHO, Police Station Deogarh to the effect that at about 08:00 p.m., the complainant along wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document