Dhanna Ram vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2096

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2096

FARJAND ALI
Dhanna Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajiv Bishnoi Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

Table of Content
1. conviction details and procedural history. (Para 2)
2. arguments on sentence reduction. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court’s observations on conviction and sentencing. (Para 5 , 6)
4. modification of sentence by the court. (Para 7)
5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT :

Farjand Ali, J.

By way of filing this Criminal Revision Petition challenge has been made to the judgment dated 29.10.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Rajsamand in Criminal appeal No.21/2002, whereby the learned appellate court affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31.05.2000 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate (First class), Rajsamand in Criminal Regular Case No.308/1996; whereby the petitioners have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Offence for which convicted	Sentence, fine and default sentence
Section 458 of the IPC	One year's simple imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo fifteen days' simple imprisonment
Section 323 of the IPC	One month simple imprisonment
Section 504 of the IPC	One month simple imprisonment