Banshi @ Banshiya vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1951

FARJAND ALI
Banshi @ Banshiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul Bathi.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P.

Table of Content
1. facts of the case regarding conviction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for reduction of sentence. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning on conviction and sentence. (Para 5 , 6)
4. modification of sentence based on legal precedents. (Para 7)
5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 8 , 9)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

By way of filing these two Criminal Revision Petitions challenge has been made to the judgement dated 10.07.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Pratapgarh in Criminal appeal No.39/2002, whereby the learned appellate court affirmed the judgement of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.07.2001 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh in Criminal Regular Case No.490/1998; whereby the petitioners have been convicted and sentenced as under :-

S. No.	Name of the petitioner	Offence for which conviced	Sentence, fine and default sentence
1.	Banshi @ Banshiya	Section 457 of the IPC	One year's simple imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.200/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo two months' simple imprisonment Section 380 of the IPC Six months'
1.	Banshi @ Banshiya