Back
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Hans Raj @ Hans Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
1. By this revision, the petitioner-convict is challenging the judgment and order dated 17.09.2003 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Srigangangar whereby, the learned Judge partly allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner and while upholding the conviction of the petitioner for offence under Sections 420 and 471 IPC, reduced the sentence awarded under Section 471 IPC to one year simple imprisonment and thus, the petitioner has been sentenced as under:
| Under Section 471 IPC | One year simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months S.I. |
| Under Section 420 IPC | One year's simple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine, to undergo one month's S.I. |
2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up is that on 21.03.1991, the office of Superintendent of Police, Sriganganagar received a complaint to the effect that the petitioner has submitted a transfer certification of Baba Haridwari Public School, 2 ML, Sriganganagar on the basis of which, he got selected as Driver in RSRTC. On verification of the educa
The court can reduce a sentence to the time already served when considering prolonged trials and the age of the petitioner, while upholding the conviction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to reduce the sentence to the period already undergone by the petitioners while maintaining the amount of fine, considering ....
The court may reduce a sentence based on the time already served and the circumstances surrounding the case, even when the conviction is upheld.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing justice and the petitioner's circumstances.
The court may reduce a sentence to the period already served, considering the duration of incarceration and the circumstances surrounding the case.
The court may reduce a sentence to the time already served when considering the circumstances of the case and the mental trauma endured during protracted trials.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 379 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served, considering the time spent in custody and the circumstances of the case.
The court emphasized that while deterrence in sentencing is crucial, mitigating factors like prolonged trials and compensation paid to victims should also influence sentencing outcomes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
