SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 819

Rajasthan High Court
Honble RAJESH BALIA, J. Honble AJAY RASTOGI, J.
Rajasthan Chemists Association - Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. & Ors. - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3407 of 2004
Decided On : March 29, 2005

Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Mehta and Vineet Kothari, for Petitioner B.P. Agarwal, Advocate-General and N.M. Lodha, Addl. Advocate-General, for Respondents

Headnote:Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994; Rajasthan Finance Act, 2004, Sec. 4-A, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 read with Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 366 clause 29-A – Constitutional validity of provisions of Finance Act, 2004, Sec. 4-A – Held – To the extent that tax on first point sale of drugs, medicines or any formulation or for that matter any other commodities by a manufacturer/wholesaler/distributor to retailer where MRP is published on package, measure to which rate of tax is to be applied cannot be with reference to such MRP, which is neither charged nor chargeable by the wholesaler from the retailer whether the tax is charged on sales or on purchase by the parties to sale u/Sec. 4-A and notification. (Paras 197 to 204)

       

Honble BALIA, J.–Vide State Finance Act, 2004, Section 4-A was inserted in the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 which reads as under:-

``4A. Levy of tax on retail sale price- (1) notwithstanding anything contained in an other provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, tax on sale of such goods, as may be specified by the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette, shall be levied and collected on the retail sale price of such goods abated by the rate specified in the said notification.

(2) The goods to be specified under sub-section (1) shall be those in relation to which it is required under the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 or the rules made thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, to declare on the package thereof the retail sale price of such goods.

(3) The State Government may, for the purpose of fixing the rate of abatement under sub-section (1), take into account the amount of sales tax and other local taxes, if any, payable on such goods.

Explanation- (i) Where on the package of any goods different retail sale prices are declared with reference to different areas, the retail sale price declared with reference to the area with the State in which it is sold shall be deemed to be the retail sale price for the purposes of this section.

(ii) Where on the package of any goods different retail sale prices are declared with reference to different areas and none of the areas falls within the State, the maximum of such retail sale prices shall be deemed to be the retail price for the purposes of this section.

(2). The present writ petition has been filed to challenge the constitutional validity of the aforesaid provision. It envisages levy of sales tax on any transaction of sale of notified goods not on the actual price of consideration which is paid or becomes payable by the buyer to seller on such sales have taken place, but on the ``maximum retail price of the goods declared on the package as per the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 or the Rules framed thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force which is chargeable only at the last point sale by a retailer. The provision is not extended generally to all commodities sold in package and in relation to which it is required to print retail price thereon but only to such goods as may be specified by the State Government by notification in the official gazette as may be abated by the rate specified in the said notification.

(3). The present writ petition has been filed by registered association of the whole sale dealers/distributor of Chemists and Druggists engaged in the business of selling of medicines, drugs and partnership preparation to the retailers.

(4). The principal contention on which the validity of the aforesaid provision has been challenged is that it takes into account the artificial amount as turnover for the purpose of tax on ``sales of goods.

(5). The tax on sale must be leviable with reference to the something related to taxing event, the sale or purchase of goods which become subject of charge and not de hors it. One or other component of such taxing event, whether be price or quantity of goods may be considered measure of tax to which rate can be applied and can be collected from the person connected with such transaction and not any criterion de-hors the taxing event.

(6). Entry 54 of the Second List of Seventh Schedule which provides subject on which State Legislature can make law reads ``Tax on sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers subject to provision of Entry 92-A of List I.

(7). The expression ``tax on sale of goods used in Entry 54 of the second list of 7th Schedule has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean ax on the sale of goods, as defined under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 as modified/extended by clause 29-A of Article 366 inserted vide 46th Amendment Act, 1942. The tax on sale of medicines under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act,


















































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top