SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 202

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
JAGDISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 249 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Deepak Menaria, Mr. Ramdev Rajpurohit, Mr. Himanshu Pareek, Mr. Chandrasen Rathore, Mr. KS Kumpawat, assistant to Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG

The court may suspend a sentence if the appellants are on bail during trial and if there is a likelihood of delay in hearing the appeal.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections relevant to bail and suspension of sentence - The court considered the appellants' bail status during trial and the likelihood of delayed hearing of the appeal. (Paras 2, 3)

(B) Suspension of sentence - The court found it appropriate to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused appellants, allowing their release on bail under specific conditions. (Paras 2, 3)

Facts of the case:
The appellants, having been convicted and sentenced by the Sessions Judge, sought suspension of their sentence due to being on bail during the trial and the anticipated delay in the appeal process.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered the suspension of the sentence and outlined conditions for the appellants' release on bail.

Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended given the circumstances of the case and the status of the appellants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the suspension of sentence was warranted due to the appellants’ prior bail status and the expected delay in the appeal process, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure their appearance in court.

Result: Applications for suspension of sentence allowed.

Order :

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned AAG and perused the material available on record.

2. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that the appellants were on bail during the trial and there is no chance of hearing of the present appeal in near future, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellants.

3. Accordingly, all the applications for suspension of sentence are allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur, vide judgment dated 28.01.2025 in Sessions Case No.158/2023 against the applicants (1) Jagdish S/o Narayan Lal, (2) Heeralal S/o Shri Nathu, (3) Raju @ Rajesh S/o Shri Kaniram @ Kishanlal, (4) Laluram S/o Shri Bhawaru & (5) Premshankar S/o Shri Kishan Lal, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this court on 28.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top