SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 199

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
LAKHVEER SINGH @ LAKHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 1217 / 2023



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s):Mr. NK Sharma For Respondent(s): Mr. KS Kumpawat, assistant to Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG

The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if the appellants are on bail and there is no imminent hearing.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389 - Application for suspension of sentence - Court allowed the application for suspension of sentence against the judgment dated 24.08.2023, recognizing that the appellants were on bail during the trial and that there was no imminent hearing of the appeal - The Court ordered that the sentence shall remain suspended until final disposal of the appeal, subject to the conditions of personal bond and sureties. (Paras 2, 3)

(B) Bail - Conditions - The appellants must appear before the trial court annually until the appeal is decided and notify any changes in residence to both the trial court and counsel. (Paras 3)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Cases) in a judgment dated 24.08.2023, and were seeking suspension of their sentence while on bail during the trial.

Findings of Court:
The Court found it appropriate to suspend the sentence, allowing the appellants to be released on bail under specified conditions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended pending the appeal, considering the appellants' prior bail status and the delay in hearing the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that given the circumstances, including the absence of an imminent hearing, it was reasonable to suspend the sentence and allow the appellants to remain on bail.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

Order :

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned AAG and perused the material available on record.

2. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that the appellants were on bail during the trial and there is no chance of hearing of the present appeal in near future, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellants.

3. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C . is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Cases) (Addl. Sessions Judge No.1), Nohar, District Hanumangarh, vide judgment dated 24.08.2023 in Sessions (CIS) Case No.54/2016 against the applicants (1) Lakhveer Singh @ Lakha S/o Shri Resham Singh & (2) Satpal Singh @ Sata S/o Shri Darshan Singh, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each (One surety shall be given by the local resident of Rajasthan State) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this court on 28.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. One surety shall be given by the local resident of Rajasthan State.

4. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top