SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 259

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Harji Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
CRLAS / 464 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Abhishek Charan for Mr. R.K. Charan, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

Suspension of sentence is warranted when the accused were on bail during trial, the contraband is below commercial quantity, and the appeal process is expected to take time.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 389 - NDPS Act - Application for suspension of sentence - Court suspended the sentence awarded to the accused appellants based on their prior bail status, the quantity of contraband being below commercial limits, and the anticipated duration of the appeal process. (Paras 6 and 7)

(B) Bail - Conditions of bail - The court imposed conditions for the accused's appearance and notification of address changes to ensure compliance during the appeal process. (Para 7)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted under the NDPS Act and sought suspension of their sentence, with the court considering their bail status during trial and the nature of the contraband involved.

Findings of Court:
The court found it appropriate to suspend the sentence given the circumstances and allowed the appellants to be released on bail with specific conditions.

Issues: The main issue addressed was whether the sentence should be suspended considering the nature of the offense and the appeal's timeline.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the application for suspension of sentence was justified due to the appellants being on bail and the contraband being below commercial quantity, indicating a lower risk while awaiting appeal.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

Order :

Heard.

2. Admit. Issue Notice.

3. Learned AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State.

4. Call for record.

5. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

6. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that the appellant(s) were on bail during the trial and the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and also taking into consideration the fact that hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).

7. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C . [Section 430 BNSS] is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge (Additional Sessions Judge No.1), NDPS Act Cases, Parbatsar, District Deedwana-Kuchaman vide judgment dated 27.02.2025 in Sessions Case No.53/2016 against the appellant-applicant(s) – 1. Harji Ram S/o Madhu Ram and 2. Rajendra S/o Mangi Lal shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/ she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 22.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

8. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top