SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 260

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Banshilal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
CRLAS / 496 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Pushkar Tamini, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, considering the case's circumstances and the need for accountability through bail conditions.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence - The court allowed the application for suspension of sentence, considering the time required for hearing the appeal and the circumstances of the case - The sentence awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge was suspended until the final disposal of the appeal with conditions for bail. (Paras 7, 8)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The accused-applicant(s) are required to appear before the trial Court annually and notify any change of residence to both the trial Court and counsel in the High Court. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The application for suspension of sentence was filed by the accused-applicant(s) who were convicted in Sessions Case No.153/2017. The court noted the lengthy process of appeal and deemed it appropriate to suspend the sentence.

Findings of Court:
The court found it fit to suspend the sentence given the circumstances and the nature of the appeal process.

Issues: The main issues addressed were whether to suspend the sentence pending appeal and the conditions for bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that given the expected delay in the appeal process, suspending the sentence was justified, while ensuring conditions were in place for the accused-applicant(s) to remain accountable.

Result: The application for suspension of sentence was allowed.

Order :

1. Heard.

2. Admit. Issue Notice.

3. Learned AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 -State.

4. Issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable within eight weeks.

5. Call for record.

6. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

7. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).

8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C . [Section 430 BNSS] is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.2, District Chittorgarh vide judgment dated 21.02.2025 in Sessions Case No.153/2017 against the appellant- applicant(s) – 1. Banshilal S/o Babulal Bawri, 2. Santosh W/ o Banshilal Bawri and 3. Prakash S/o Sajjan Bawri shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 22.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

9. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top