SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 882

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
Omprakash @ Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ram Kumar Bohra, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.324/2024 registered at Police Station Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh, for the offences under Sections 117(2), 109(1), 115(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submitted that injured- Kaluram in his statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has stated that on the date of the alleged incident, he along with the petitioner and the co- accused Omprakash @ Prakash Karela was sitting on the rooftop of the house of Omprakash and were drinking alcohol. As per the injured- Kaluram, suddenly a quarrel erupted between them whereupon petitioner and the co-accused Omprakash @ Prakash beat him up and threw him down from the roof due to which he sustained injuries which are grievous in nature and dangerous to life.

4. Drawing attention of the Court towards the challan papers, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top