SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 349

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
BALA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Priyanka Borana, Mr. Shrawan Singh Rathore, PP, Mr. Suresh Kumbhat

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.168/2024 registered at Police Station RIICO Area, District Barmer, for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 324(4) and 3(5) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR, challan papers and the statements of the injured persons recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the specific allegation of causing gunshot injury upon the son of the complainant has been levelled against the co-accused Karna Ram. Learned counsel further submitted that the injuries sustained by the son of the complainant is on his non-vital body parts. Further, the firearm has been recovered from the co-accused Karna Ram only.

4. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; challan has already been filed and the trial of the case is likely to consume sufficiently long time. On these grounds, he implored the Court to enlarge the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top