SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 537

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI, J
Devi Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Dhruv Gehlot for Claimants, Mr. Aditya Singhi for Ins. Company

Order :

1. Despite service upon respondent No.1-owner and respondent No.2-driver, nobody has put in appearance.

2. The present civil misc. appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘MV Act’) assailing the judgment and award dated 29.10.2014 passed by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Bikaner, (Raj.), (‘learned Tribunal’) in Claim Case No.103/2013, whereby the learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition filed by the claimants and awarded compensation of Rs.1,80,000/-, in favour of claimants along with interest @ 7.5% p.a. while fastening the liability upon the respondents.

3. Brief facts of the case are that on 18.12.2012, Kushal Singh(deceased) was going to purchase some grocery item from his house and when he reached on N.H.15, a Motorcycle bearing Registration No.RJ-07-SL-6798, driven in a rash and negligent manner by the respondent No.2, hit Kushal Singh and he received simple as well as serious injuries and finally succumbed to death on 21.12.2012. The claimants, filed a claim petition before the learned Tribunal. Notices were issued and respondents Nos.1 and 2 did not appear and ex parte proceedings

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top