HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI, J
Pappu Lal And Anr. - Appellant
Versus
Shambhu Regar And Ors. - Respondent
CMA / 1316 / 2014
Decided On : 13-02-2025
(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Appeal against compensation awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Compensation of Rs.3,25,000/- awarded, modified to Rs.5,65,000/- by the court based on notional income of deceased child and applicable multiplier - Court emphasized the need for just compensation reflecting loss of dependency and conventional heads. (Paras 1, 6, 8, 10)
(B) Compensation - Determination of compensation for minors - Notional income of deceased child taken as Rs.30,000/- p.a. with a multiplier of 15 based on precedents. (Paras 6, 7)
Facts of the case:
The appeal was filed by the parents of a 13-year-old girl who died in a motor accident caused by a negligent driver. The initial compensation awarded was deemed insufficient.
Findings of Court:
The court found the initial compensation inadequate and modified it to Rs.5,65,000/- considering loss of dependency and conventional heads.
Issues: The main issues were the adequacy of compensation awarded by the Tribunal and the appropriate notional income and multiplier for a minor's death.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the notional income for a deceased minor should reflect judicial precedents, emphasizing the need for adequate compensation for loss of dependency.
Result: Appeal partly allowed, compensation enhanced to Rs.5,65,000/-.
ORDER :
(NUPUR BHATI, J.)
1. The present civil misc. appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants underSection 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘MV Act’) assailing the judgment and award dated 08.05.2014 passed by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahpura, District Bhilwara, (‘learned Tribunal’) in Claim Case No.552/2010 whereby the learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition filed by the claimants and awarded compensation of Rs.3,25,000/-, in favour of claimants along with interest @ 7 % p.a. while fastening the liability upon the respondents jointly and severally.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 06.09.2010 at about 4:00 pm, Maina (deceased) was coming home, suddenly a motor cycle bearing Registration No.RJ-06-SA-1208, driven in a rash and negligent manner by the respondent No.2, hit Maina and as a result whereof, she died during her treatment. Her parents, being the claimants, filed a claim petition before the learned Tribunal. Notices were issued and respondents Nos.1,2 and 3, filed reply to the claim petition while denying the averments made in the claim petition. On the basis of the pleadings, the learned Tribunal framed four issues. Oral as well as documentary evidences were produced by the claimants in support of their claim petition and on the other hand one evidence was produced by the respondents and after hearing both the parties, the learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition of the claimants and held the respondents liable to pay the quantum of compensation in favour of the claimants and thus, being dissatisfied of the quantum, the appellants have preferred the instant misc. appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned tribunal has erred in awarding meager amount of compensation to the deceased on account of her death is of 13 years of age. He submits that taking into consideration the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd VS. Zaharulnisha & Ors. (Civil Appeal No.3055/2008 ) direction of pay and recover may be ordered.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company vehemently objects and submits that the learned tribunal has rightly passed the award.
5. I have heard and considered the submissions advanced at Bar and have gone through the material available on record.
6. This Court finds that the learned Tribunal has awarded the amount of Rs.3,25,000/- as quantum of compensation to the appellants/claimants. However, this court finds that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kishan Gopal and Ors. Vs. Lala and Ors. : [(2014) 1 SCC 244] , where the age of the deceased child was 10 years has taken the notional income of the deceased child as Rs. 30,000/- p.a. looking to the facts and circumstances. Further, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kurvan Ansari and Ors. Vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu and Ors. : [(2022) 1 SCC 317] , where the age of the deceased child was 7 years, has taken notional income of the deceased child as Rs. 25,000/- p.a. and after applying Multiplier of 15 granted total of Rs. 3,75,000/- under the head of ‘loss of dependency’ and also an amount of Rs. 40,000/- to each of the parents under the head of filial consortium and Rs.15,000/- under the head of funeral expenses. Furthermore, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Meena Devi Vs. Nunu Chand Mahto and Ors. : [(2023) 1 SCC 204], where the age of the deceased child was 12 years, has taken the notional income as Rs. 30,000/- p.a. including future prospect and applied Multiplier of 15 to arrive at the compensation awardable under the head of ‘loss of dependency’ and awarded Rs. 50,000/- under the conventional heads.
7. Thus, looking to the age of the deceased child (i.e., 13 years) and peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and in the light of the above cited judgments, this court deems it appropriate to take the notional income of the deceased child as Rs.30,000/- p.a. Also, the applicable multiplier would be of 15 in t
Kishan Gopal and Ors. Vs. Lala and Ors.
The court established that compensation for a deceased minor should be based on notional income and applicable multipliers, ensuring just compensation reflecting loss of dependency.
The court established that compensation for minors must reflect notional income and apply appropriate multipliers, ensuring just compensation for loss of dependency.
The court established that compensation for the death of a minor must reflect notional income and apply appropriate multipliers based on established precedents.
The court established that compensation for deceased minors must reflect notional income and apply appropriate multipliers for just compensation.
The court established that compensation for the death of a minor must reflect loss of dependency, applying a multiplier based on age and relevant legal precedents.
The court established that compensation for a minor's death in an accident should reflect notional income and appropriate multipliers, enhancing the award from Rs.2,25,000 to Rs.5,65,000.
The court upheld the compensation awarded for the death of a minor, affirming the adequacy of Rs.5,00,000/- as just and reasonable under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Compensation for fatal accidents involving minors must utilize a notional income reflective of current economic conditions and an appropriate multiplier based on the child's age.
Fatal accident – It is appropriate to take notional income of child victim at Rs.25,000/- per annum, taking into account inflation, devaluation of rupee and cost of living.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.