HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
HIRIYA @ HIRALAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 327 / 2025
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 430 - Application for suspension of sentence - The appellant was on bail and the trial court had suspended the sentence for one month - The court found it fit to suspend the sentence pending appeal due to the lengthy hearing process. (Paras 1, 2, 3)
(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The appellant must execute a personal bond and provide sureties, with conditions regarding appearance and notification of address changes. (Paras 4, 5)
Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted and sentenced by the Special Judge, NDPS Cases, and had been on bail prior to the appeal. The trial court had suspended the sentence for one month.
Findings of Court:
The court allowed the application for suspension of sentence, ordering the appellant's release on bail under specified conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended pending the appeal, considering the appellant's prior bail status and the expected duration of the appeal process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that given the circumstances, it was appropriate to suspend the sentence, allowing the appellant to remain free while awaiting the appeal's outcome.
Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.
Order :
1. Heard.
2. Admit.
3. Issue notice.
4. Learned Addl. Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of sole respondent.
5. Call for record.
6. Heard on application of suspension of sentence No.306/2025.
7. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant was on bail and the sentence has already been suspended by the trial Court for a period of one month.
8. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant was on bail during and the sentence has already been suspended by the trial court for a period of one month and hearing of the appeal will take sufficient long time, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant.
9. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Sagwara, District Dungarpur, vide judgment dated 18.01.2025 in Sessions Case No.22/2022 (CIS No.22/2022) against the appellant-applicant Hiriya @ Hiralal S/o Padiya shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he will be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in the court on 18.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
10. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if the appellant was previously on bail and the appeal process is expected to be lengthy.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if justified by the circumstances, subject to compliance with specified bail conditions.
The court allowed the suspension of sentence pending appeal based on the absence of custody and prior temporary suspension, imposing conditions for bail.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence pending appeal if justified by the case's circumstances, subject to specific conditions.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence pending appeal if justified by the case's circumstances and arguments presented.
The court may suspend a sentence if the petitioner meets certain conditions, including prior bail status and compliance with legal obligations.
Suspension of sentence justified when appellant on bail during trial and contraband is below commercial quantity, emphasizing lengthy appeal process.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if justified by circumstances, requiring compliance with specific bail conditions.
The court may suspend a sentence if the appellant was on bail during trial and there is no imminent hearing of the appeal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.