Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Satveer – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.)
1. By way of filing the instant criminal revision petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 13.09.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, in Criminal Appeal No.26/2004 whereby the learned appellate court affirmed the conviction and sentence vide judgment dated 04.10.2004 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadra, District Hanumangarh in Criminal Case No.465/1999 by which the learned trial Judge convicted and sentenced the petitioner as under:-
| Offence | Sentence | Fine & default sentence |
| Sec. 279 IPC | 6 months’ | SI Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, 1 months’ SI |
| Sec. 304-A IPC | 2 years’ RI | Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, 4 months’ SI |
| Sec. 337 IPC | 6 months’ | SI Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, 1 months’ SI |
2. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the period spent in judicial custody shall be adjusted in the original imprisonment.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 18.09.1999, Shri Paramjeet Singh gave Parcha Bayan that he along with his family was travelling to Gogamedi from Hissar in a rented Jeep bearing registration No.
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing the need for a just and reasonable sentence considering the petitioner's circumstances.
The court established that while the conviction for negligent driving resulting in death and injury was warranted, sentencing should consider the individual circumstances of the offender, including a....
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving but reduced the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's age and circumstances.
The court established that in cases of negligence leading to death, the sentence can be adjusted based on the defendant's personal circumstances and the duration of the legal proceedings.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing justice and the petitioner's age and circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing justice and the petitioner's circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving but modified the sentence to time already served, considering the petitioner's socio-economic background and the duration of the trial.
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to reflect the time served, considering the petitioner's personal circumstances and hardships.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's long trial and personal hardships.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to time served, emphasizing justice and the petitioner's circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
