Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Iqbal Mohd.@ Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Order :
1. By way of filing the instant criminal revision petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 20.06.2006 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.2, Udaipur, in Criminal Appeal No.26/2005 (66/2005) whereby the learned appellate Court while rejecting the appeal filed against the judgment of conviction dated 04.05.2005 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udaipur, in Regular Criminal Case No.21/2003 by which the learned trial Judge has convicted &sentenced the petitioner as under:-
| Offence | Sentence | Fine & default sentence |
| Sec. 279 IPC | 3 months’ SI | ---- |
| Sec. 337 IPC | 4 months’ SI | ---- |
| Sec. 338 IPC | 1 Year’s SI | ---- |
| Sec. 304A IPC | 2 Years’ SI | Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, three months’ S.I. |
2. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the period spent in judicial custody shall be adjusted in the original imprisonment.
3. The gist of the prosecution story is that on 11.07.1999 complainant Kailashchand gave a report at to the effect that on 11.07.1999 at about 7.15 P.M. when he went to his village Karanpur in Jeep bearing registration No.RJ-27-P-2657. In the said jeep total 10-12 passengers were present. When the jeep reached at Deb
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to reflect the time served, considering the petitioner's personal circumstances and hardships.
The court established that while the conviction for negligent driving resulting in death and injury was warranted, sentencing should consider the individual circumstances of the offender, including a....
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing the need for a just and reasonable sentence considering the petitioner's circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's circumstances and the lengthy trial duration.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing justice and the petitioner's age and circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence based on the petitioner's personal circumstances and time served, emphasizing the need for a just punishment.
Court upheld conviction for reckless driving but modified sentence based on humanitarian grounds considering age and time served.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to time served, emphasizing justice and the petitioner's circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's age and circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving but reduced the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's age and circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
