HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Birda Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Order :
1. By way of filing the instant criminal revision petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 08.04.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Jodhpur, in Criminal Appeal No.13/2004 whereby the learned appellate Court dismissed the appeal filed against the judgment of conviction dated 16.04.2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Jodhpur in Criminal Case No.12188/2000 by which the learned trial Judge convicted and sentenced the petitioner as under:-
| Offence | Sentence | Fine | Sentence in default of fine |
| Section 279 IPC | 6 months’ S.I. | Rs.200/- | 7 days’ S.I. |
| Section 304A IPC | 2 years’ S.I. | Rs.500/- | 15 days’ S.I. |
| Section 337 IPC | 6 months’ S.I. | Rs.200/- | 7 days’ S.I. |
2. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the period spent in judicial custody shall be adjusted in the original imprisonment.
3. The gist of the prosecution story is that on 12.09.2000, one Pappu gave a written report to the Police at Police Station Industrial Area Basni, Jodhpur to the effect that he was driving a truck bearing No. RJ-19-G-2636 from Jhalamand to Jodhpur loaded with Nirma soap and surf, wherein Shri Om Prakash, Ashok and Bhagwana Ram were sitting. When his truck reached pa
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's age and circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's long trial and personal hardships.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving but reduced the sentence to the time already served, considering the petitioner's age and circumstances.
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing the need for a just and reasonable sentence considering the petitioner's circumstances.
The court modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing justice and considering the petitioner's age and hardships.
Court upheld conviction for reckless driving but modified sentence based on humanitarian grounds considering age and time served.
The court affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to reflect the time served, considering the petitioner's personal circumstances and hardships.
The court established that while the conviction for negligent driving resulting in death and injury was warranted, sentencing should consider the individual circumstances of the offender, including a....
The court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence based on the petitioner's personal circumstances and time served, emphasizing the need for a just punishment.
The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing justice and the petitioner's age and circumstances.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.