Back
2025 Supreme(Raj) 1495
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.
HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Ramprasad Meena S/o. Shri Chhitar Singh & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2724 of 2015
Decided On : 06-05-2025
For the Appellant : Mr. Virendra Agarwal, Adv. with Ms. Anjali Assat.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena, Adv., Mr. Anoop Agarwal, Adv. & Mr. Avinash Arya, Adv.
Compensation for motor accident injuries must address both pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, ensuring just restoration to the claimant's pre-accident position.
Headnote:
(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173 and 166 - Compensation for injuries in motor accidents - The court emphasized the need for just compensation, considering both pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses suffered by the claimant. (Paras 12, 13, 15)
(B) Determination of compensation - The court reiterated that compensation must restore the claimant to their pre-accident position, applying fair and equitable principles. (Paras 12, 15)
(C) Legal principles - The court highlighted that the determination of just compensation cannot be equated to a bonanza, but must be reasonable and just. (Paras 12, 15)
Facts of the case:
The case involved a motor accident where the claimant sought compensation for injuries sustained, arguing for both physical and non-pecuniary losses. The court considered various precedents and statutory provisions in determining the compensation amount.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the claimant was entitled to compensation that adequately addressed both physical injuries and the inability to enjoy life fully due to the accident.
Issues: The main issues included the appropriate method for calculating compensation and the balance between pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that just compensation must be determined by applying fair principles, ensuring that the claimant is restored to their prior position as much as possible.
Result: Compensation awarded as per the court's determination.
ORDER :
1- vihykaV chek dEiuh dh vksj ls ;g vihy /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds vUrxZr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk okn U;k;kf/kdj.k] dksViwryh] ftyk&t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&886@2011] cmuoku jkeizlkn eh.kk cuke eqds'k dqekj o vU; ds ekeys esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 04-05-2015 ¼ftls vkxs ^vkyksP; fu.kZ;* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh x;h gSA ftlds }kjk DysesaV&jsLiksaMsaV uEcj&1 dks eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ;kph dks dqy 17]77]590@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 7-5 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA
2- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh dk rdZ jgk gS fd ekeys dh ?kVuk fnukad 12-08-2011 dks ?kfVr gksuk crk;k x;k gS rFkk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fnukad 15-08-2011 dks foyEc ls ntZ djokbZ x;h gS] tcfd vkgr Lo;a iqfyldehZ gS] bl dkj.k lEiw.kZ ?kVuk lansgkLin gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa iz'uxr okgu dks xyr :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd dfFkr p'enhn xokg ,-MCY;w&2 ds c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 161 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk fnukad 31-08-2011 dks foyEc ls ntZ fd;s x;s gSa tks ekus tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd nq?kZVuk dk uD'kk ekSdk fnukad 31-08-2011 dks cuk;k x;k gS rFkk DysesaV@jsLiksaMsaV la[;k&1 dk fpfdRldh; ijh{k.k Hkh fnukad 01-09-2011 dks foyEc ls djok;k x;k gS] tks Hkh ?kVuk dks lansgkLin cukrk gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd iz'uxr okgu pkyd ds fo#) vfHk;ksx&i= izLrqr dj fn;s tkus ek= ls nq?kZVuk lkfcr ugha ekuh tk ldrh gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd DysesaV@jsLiksaMsaV la[;k&1 ds 'kjhj ij tks LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk dkfjr gqbZ gS] mlds dkfjr gksus ls DysesaV dh vk; esa dksbZ {kfr ugha gqbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd DysesaV@jsLiksaMsaV la[;k&1 nq?kZVuk ds le; iqfyl foHkkx esa dk;Zjr Fkk] mldk osru de ugha gqvk gS cfYd osru esa o`f) gqbZ gSA bl dkj.k fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk DysesaV dks vk; dh gkfu ds en esa tks jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] og xyr fnyokbZ x;h gSA vr% mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij vihykaV chek dEiuh dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k&2724@2015 Lohdkj dh tkdj fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; dks vikLr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykaV chek dEiuh }kjk U;k;ky; dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;k x;k %&
● HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Guddi W/o Late Rambhajan, reported in (2023) 0 Supreme (Raj.)418
● Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Akeela Bano & Ors., reported in 2023 (1) CCR 266 (Raj.)
● Rajender Vs. Om Prakash & Ors. reported in MACD 2007 (1) (Raj.) 361
● Jagdish Narayan Vs. Dharmendra @ Dharma & Ors. (S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1032/2018) decided on 03.07.2018 &
● The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Satish Chandra Sharma & Ors., reported in MANU/SC/0422/2022.
3- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk DysesaV@jsLiksaMsVa la[;k&1 dk rdZ jgk gS fd nq?kZVuk esa DysesaV ds 'kjhj esa rhu txg vfLFkHkax gqvk FkkA nq?kZVuk ds rqjra ckn bZykt ds fy, vLirky esa HkrhZ djok;k x;k Fkk] tgka HkrhZ jgdj mldk bZykt pyk gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk DysesaV@vkgr dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd iz'uxr okgu Lokeh iq"dj nRr us uksfVl vUrxZr /kkjk 133 ,e-oh- ,DV ds tokc izn'kZ&6 esa nq?kZVuk dkfjr gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA bl izdkj nq?kZVuk lafnX/k ugha gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk DysesaV@jsLiksaMsaV la[;k&1 dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd nq?kZVuk esa vkbZ pksVksa ls DysesaV ds 'kjhj esa tks LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk dkfjr gksuk ik;k x;k gS] mlls DysesaV@jsLiksaMsVa la[;k&1 dks inksUufr dk uqdlku gqvk gS] bl dkj.k DysesaV@jsLiksaMsVa la[;k&1 dks vk; dh gkfu ds en esa tks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyokbZ x;h gS] mlesa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ekStwn ugha gSA vr% mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij vihykaV chek dEiuh dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k&2724@2015 dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus rFkk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA vi
