Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA
Deepak Sogarwal S/o Shri Sajjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANAND SHARMA, J.
1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction against the respondents to give him appointment on the post of Sub Inspector/Platoon Commander in Rajasthan Police and to hold that physical efficiency test conducted by Respondent No. 2 on 28.02.2011 in respect of ex-servicemen was contrary to the provisions of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Absorption of Ex-Servicemen) Rules, 1988 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Rules of 1988’) and a declaration has been sought that the provisions of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Rules of 1989’) shall not be applicable so far as selection process for the posts reserved for ex-servicemen is concerned.
2. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner was enrolled in Indian Air Force as an Air Craftman and after completing services of 15 years, he was discharged on 07.11.2005. The petitioner also belongs to OBC category. Thus, in view of above, the petitioner was entitled for taking benefits attached to the certificate relating to ex-servicemen. It has also been averred that the respondent-Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Ex-servicemen undergoing recruitment must be assessed under specific rules outlining moderate fitness standards, rather than rigorous standards applied to younger recruits.
The court upheld the validity of a notification imposing physical test conditions, affirming that they were in accordance with the original recruitment advertisement and rules, not altering the selec....
The court reaffirmed that candidates participating in a selection process cannot challenge the established criteria post-participation, emphasizing adherence to statutory rules and the irrelevance of....
Eligibility criteria for Ex-servicemen in recruitment must align with statutory rules; arbitrary conditions imposed by executive instructions are unlawful.
Unsuccessful candidates cannot challenge the criteria/rules of selection after participating in the recruitment process. Different criteria for male and female candidates can be based on their physic....
Point of law: conciliation proceedings or any proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act were pending and therefore in the middle of the proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act, the Governme....
In the absence of a specific provision allowing for a second chance for the PET in the recruitment process for Constables, the Court cannot grant such a chance to candidates who missed the PET due to....
The benefit of reservation provided to ex-servicemen in the advertisement of 2015 could not have been withdrawn in 2019. The Rules of 1963 would prevail over the Rules of 1988.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
